As far as I'm concerned the Chiarelli honeymoon ends today. When he announced that Dave Lewis was fired as head coach Peter Chiarelli said, "I made the assessment that his way wasn’t compatible with our guys." But why did it take a full season to figure that out? Why did he tell Lewis he had a job next year at the end of the season? Why, then, did he hire Lewis in the first place?
Chiarelli and Lewis planned a long-term rebirth for the Bruins last summer, but Chiarelli didn't stick to it. So either way you cut it, it's a mistake. Either Chiarelli made a mistake by hiring Lewis, or he made a mistake by firing him after only one season. But that wasn't his first mistake as Bruins GM, nor was it his first regarding the coaching job. Chiarelli's first mistake as GM came before he even took over officially. It came when he allowed Mike Sullivan to hang on in limbo long after he would have the chance to find another coaching job. In my opinion that was despicable. They say it's "just part of the game" but if you look at the winners around the league and elsewhere a hallmark is that they treat their personnel with respect. The Bruins haven't done that in many years, and I believe this more than anything else has gutted a once great team. I had hoped that the Chiarelli era would be different.
Chiarelli's next mistake? That would be to listen to those who think he should go after J. S. Giguere. The problem with the Bruins isn't goaltending--it isn't even lack of talent in general. I believe that if you put Tim Thomas in a Ducks uniform at the begiining of this season rather than in a spoked-B he'd have lifted the Stanley Cup. He's an excellent goaltender, but more importantly, he's a fierce competitor. Conversely, if you had put J.S. Giguere in a spoked-B the Bruins fans would be whining about how awful he turned out to be. Behind Thomas is Hannu Tiovanen who despite his very poor season has the skill and athletic ability to one-day carry a team deep into the playoffs. Maybe that day will come this season. And waiting in the wings is Rask, who is the highest-touted goaltender prospect out there. Assuming Giguere would even accept an offer to come to Boston (and he'd be an idiot if he did) it would come at a huge price and would be a colossal blunder.
So forget goaltending. As I see it the Bruins have two main problems: 1. the players don't believe in each other and are not motivated to play hard physically, and 2. the present makeup of the team isn't balanced enough. If we are lucky the new coach will solve problem 1. But it will take some very hard choices and some expert negotiating by the GM to solve problem 2 without giving away the farm. I believe the Bruins need more strength and grit up front. The only way to get that in short order may be to trade away some of the speed and skill. I don't mean trade Murray--he's the kind of player the B's need. I mean trade away Bochenski or even Bergeron. Because the biggest mistake the Bruins have made wasn't Chiarelli's--it was made in the post-lockout when a premium was placed on speed and skill over grit for the "new NHL." But the "new NHL," where speed and skill mattered most, did not last. Anaheim just proved that beyond any shadow of a doubt.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Whoa! Someone just woke up #4! Agreed about goaltending. They've invested quite a bit on their future goaltenders (Toivonen and/or Rask) to just give up and sign a free agent.
As for coaching, I disagree...I think a fresh new face needs to be hired. The "new" NHL ultimately didn't win the cup this year, but having the two best defensemen in the NHL on your team can tend to thwart that.
Since that's a unique case and something that only one team can do, I think it's too soon to pooh-pooh the "new" NHL. The Bruins need to show that they're willing to grasp the future and hiring an old face won't accomplish that...not unless a Donato or Milbury is embracing a faster style of play.
Hey doobie. I'm not sure what it is you are disagreeing with me about coaching (I didn't actually address the issue of a new coach). My feeling is that in the feel-good rush to embrace a new coach and the hope it brings, fans are missing the real point: Chiarelli screwed up and did it in a potentially destructive way. Remember, this is the team nobody wanted to play for after the lockout... in that respect the new NHL really is a revolution. The B's management needs to be a class act.
As for the "new NHL" on the ice go back and have a look at the playoffs from 2006 and compare them to what we just saw. The refs called far less this year, particularly in front of the net. The result was the old grit game where the strongest meanest guy was the one left standing. How many times did we see a guy cross-checked to the ice in front of the net with no call? Good or bad I think it signals that the way to win is more Anaheim or Detroit than Buffalo or Ottawa. I also think Detroit was the second best team!
The good news is that in the new "new NHL" big Z can be a force to reckon with should a new coach persuade him to be. He'd better keep his elbos down though.
Post a Comment